¿La detección de toxinas de Clostridioides difficile es necesaria cuando se detecta la enzima glutamato deshidrogenasa? / Is Clostridioides difficile toxins detection necessary when the glutamate dehydrogenase enzyme is detected?

Resumen Introducción: Clostridioides difficile causa diarrea y colitis pseudomembranosa. Su diagnóstico se realiza con la detección de glutamato-deshidrogenasa (GDH) o las toxinas A y B y se confirma con pruebas de amplificación de ácidos nucleicos. Objetivo: Definir si la determinación de GDH es redundante a la de las toxinas. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de muestras fecales de pacientes con sospecha de infección por Clostridioides difficile. Las toxinas y GDH se determinaron mediante inmunocromatografía. Se realizó una simulación bayesiana con los cocientes de probabilidad; se consideró significativo un valor de p < 0.05. Resultados: Se analizaron 329 resultados de GDH y toxinas A y B. Se encontró una prevalencia de infección de Clostridioides difficile de 18.2 %. La sensibilidad y especificidad de la prueba de GDH fue de 0.90 y 0.89, respectivamente. El cociente de probabilidad positivo fue de 8.9 y el negativo, de 0.11. Conclusiones: Un resultado negativo de GDH disminuye considerablemente la probabilidad de infección, pero no la descarta. La detección de toxinas de Clostridioides difficile puede ser necesaria en instituciones donde la amplificación de ácidos nucleicos no es económica o accesible.

Abstract Introduction: Clostridioides difficile causes diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis. Its diagnosis is made with glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) or toxins A and B detection and is confirmed with nucleic acid amplification tests. Objective: To define if GDH determination is redundant to that of toxins. Methods: Retrospective, observational study in diarrheal stools of patients with suspected Clostridioides difficile infection. Toxins and GDH were determined by immunochromatography. Bayesian simulation was performed with likelihood ratios; a p-value < 0.05 was regarded as significant. Results: 329 GDH and toxin A and B results were analyzed. Clostridioides difficile infection prevalence was 18.2 %. Sensitivity and specificity of the GDH test were 0.90 and 0.89, respectively. Positive likelihood ratio was 8.9, and negative was 0.11. Conclusions: A negative GDH result considerably reduces the probability of infection but does not rule it out. Clostridioides difficile toxins detection may be necessary in institutions where nucleic acid amplification is not affordable or accessible.

Glutamato deshidrogenasa: Su valor diagnóstico en la diarrea por Clostridioides difficile / Glutamate dehydrogenase: Its diagnostic value in Clostridioides difficile diarrhea

Clostridioides difficile es el principal agente causal de diarreas asociadas al cuidado de la salud. Esta bacteria produce toxinas y una enzima que se encuentra muy conservada en la especie: la glutamato deshidrogenasa (GDH). El diagnóstico rápido y el tratamiento efectivo permiten la pronta mejoría del paciente, con el consecuente control de la diseminación del microorganismo. Sin embargo, aún no se cuenta con un método diagnóstico óptimo y se propone la realización de diversas pruebas, cuyos resultados se interpretan en el contexto de ciertos algoritmos. En este trabajo se evaluó el desempeño de la GDH como prueba de tamizaje en el diagnóstico de la diarrea por c. difficile. Se estudiaron 615 muestras de materia fecal. Se determinó la presencia de GDH y de toxinas mediante el equipo diagnóstico de enzimoinmunoensayo de membrana C. DIFF QUIK-CHEK COMPLETE® (TECHLAB) y se realizaron cultivos para la búsqueda de C. difficile. Se calcularon los valores de sensibilidad, especificidad, VPP y VPN con un nivel de significación p < 0,05. Se detectó GDH en 266 muestras (43,25%), con una sensibilidad del 100% y una especificidad del 87,10%, IC95: 84,58-91,42. Se hallaron toxinas en 218 muestras (35,45%) y C. difficile desarrolló en 235 cultivos (38,21%). De 48 muestras GDH positivas y sin producción de toxina/s, 17 fueron positivas al cultivo de C. difficile, con 15 aislamientos toxigénicos y 2 no toxigénicos. No hubo desarrollo de C. difficile en las 31 muestras restantes. Ninguna muestra GDH negativa dio resultado positivo de toxina/s ni desarrollo en el cultivo, por lo cual el VPN de la GDH fue del 100%, mientras que el VPP fue del 81,9%. Concluimos que la determinación de GDH representa un screening adecuado para descartar casos de diarrea por C. difficile, por lo tanto de valor en los algoritmos diagnósticos de las diarreas infecciosas.

Clostridioides difficile is the main etiological agent of diarrhea associated with health care, it produces toxins and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), an enzyme that is highly conserved in this species. Rapid diagnosis and effective treatment produce prompt improvement of the patient and subsequent control of the microorganism spread. There are several techniques whose results are interpreted in the context of algorithms. However, the optimal diagnostic method is yet unknown. The performance of GDH as a screening test for the diagnosis of C. difficile diarrhea was assessed. Six hundred and fifteen stool samples were studied. The presence of GDH and toxins presence was determined by TECHLAB® C. DIFF QUIK-CHEK COMPLETE and the samples were cultured for the search of C. difficile. The values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated with a p value of 0.05 or less. GDH was detected in 266 samples (43.25%), with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 87.10%, IC95: 84.58-91.42; toxin/s were detected in 218 (35.45%) and C. difficile developed in 235 cultures (38.21%). From 48 samples with positive GDH and negative toxin/s, 15 toxigenic and 2 non-toxigenic isolates were obtained, the remaining 31 samples were negative for C. difficile. All GDH-negative samples were negative for toxins or culture, therefore, GDH NPV was 100%, while PPV was 81.9%. We conclude that GDH is a suitable screening test for the diagnostic algorithm of C. difficile diarrhea.

A thermophilic microorganism from Deception Island, Antarctica with a thermostable glutamate dehydrogenase activity

BACKGROUND: The Antarctic continent is a source of extreme microorganisms. Millions of years of isolation have produced unique biodiversity with adaptive responses to its extreme environment. Although the Antarctic climate is mainly cold, the presence of several geothermal sites, including thermal springs, fumaroles, hot soils and hydrothermal vents, provides ideal environments for the development of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic microorganisms. Their enzymes, called thermoenzymes, are the focus of interest in both academic and industrial research, mainly due to their high thermal activity and stability. Glutamate dehydrogenase, is an enzyme that plays a key role in the metabolism of carbon and nitrogen catalyzing reversibly the oxidative deamination of glutamate to alpha-ketoglutarate and ammonium. It belongs to the family of oxidoreductases, is widely distributed and it has been highly regarded for use as biosensors, particularly for their specificity and ability to operate in photochemical and electrochemical systems. However, the use of enzymes as biosensors is relatively problematic due to their instability to high temperatures, organic solvents and denaturing agents. The purpose of this study is to present the partial characterization of a thermophilic microorganism isolated from Deception Island, Antarctica, that displays glutamate dehydrogenase activity. RESULTS: In this work, we report the isolation of a thermophilic microorganism called PID15 from samples of Deception Island collected during the Antarctic Scientific Expedition ECA 46. This microorganism is a thermophile that grows optimally at 50 °C and pH 8.0. Scanning electron microscopy shows rod cells of 2.0 to 8.0 µm of length. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene revealed that this microorganism is closely related to Bacillus gelatini. This microorganism contains a thermostable glutamate dehydrogenase with optimal activity at pH 8.0 and temperatures for its activity from 37 to 50 °C, range of temperature of interest for biotechnological applications. This glutamate dehydrogenase is a highly thermostable enzyme. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of a microorganism from Antarctica containing a thermostable glutamate dehydrogenase that maintains its activity in a broad range of temperatures making it of potential interest for biotechnological applications.

Evaluation of a Rapid Membrane Enzyme Immunoassay for the Simultaneous Detection of Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection

We evaluated the new C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (CD COMPLETE; TechLab, USA), which is a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay that uses a combination of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) antigen and toxin A and B detection. A total of 608 consecutive loose stool specimens collected from the patients with suspected Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) from August to December 2012 were subjected to the CD COMPLETE and VIDAS Clostridium difficile A & B (VIDAS CDAB; bioMerieux, France). Their performances were compared with a toxigenic culture as a reference. Stool specimens that were culture-negative and CD COMPLETE- or VIDAS CDAB-positive were analyzed by using an enrichment procedure. In comparison to the toxigenic cultures, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were 63.6%, 98.0%, 76.1%, and 96.4%, respectively, for the CD COMPLETE-toxin and 75.5%, 97.4%, 72.5%, and 97.8%, respectively, for the VIDAS CDAB. In comparison to the enriched C. difficile cultures, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the CD COMPLETE-GDH were 91.0%, 92.4%, 70.5%, and 98.1%, respectively. The CD COMPLETE is a reliable method for the diagnosis of CDI and provides greater sensitivity than toxin enzyme immunoassay alone. Furthermore, the CD COMPLETE-GDH has advantages over direct culture in detecting C. difficile.

Enzymatic method for branched chain alpha-ketoacid determination: application to rapid analysis of urine and plasma samples from maple syrup urine disease patients

A new method for the determination of branched-chain alpha-ketoacid concentration using lactate dehydrogenase (E C 1.1.1.27) isozyme C4 (LDH) C4) from mouse testes is proposed. The assay is performed on urine and plasma without previous treatment. Alpha-ketoglutarate and pyruvate are determined on the same sample using glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH,EC 1.4.1.2) and lactate dehydrogenase isozyme A4 (LDH5) respectively and subtracted from the total alpha-ketoacid concentration obtained with LDH C4. This value corresponds to the branched chain alpha-ketoacid. Results were linear within the concentration range 8 to 170 mumoles/L. Detection limit was 8 mumoles/L. Analytical recovery was higher than 91 per cent. For microplate assays, recoveries were higher than 84 per cent and the detection limit was 20 mumoles/L. Determinations performed with GDH, LDH A4 and LDH C4 allow differentiation of E3 deficiency from other clinical phenotypes of maple syrup urine disease. The method is simple and fast, and adaptation to microplates would allow screening of newborns.

Transamination and glutamate deamination in Rana hexadactyla during induced ammonia toxicity.

Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and the transaminases namely aspartate aminotransferase (AAT) and alanine aminotransferase (AIAT) were estimated in the muscle, liver, kidney, and brain of control and ammonium acetate administered frogs. The results indicated tissue specific responses during induced ammonotoxemia. The inherent endogenous ammonia production decreased in all the tissues. 2-Keto glutarate production appears to be the other main adaptive feature as a result of slightly stepped up transdeamination patterns.